To this end, I want to offer three areas for consideration where one can see liberalism’s two opposing parts advancing a consistent and uniform end by effectually engaging in a pincer movement from two different directions, and in the process destabilizing the very … Liberalism is the culmination of developments in Western society that produced a sense of the importance of human individuality, a liberation of the individual from complete subservience to the group, and a relaxation of the tight hold of custom, law, and authority. His essay The End of Neo-liberalism and the Rebirth of History reads like a tongue-in-cheek reply to Fukuyama’s End of History. At the end of the Cold War, the political scientist Francis Fukuyama wrote a celebrated essay called ‘The end of history? IN WATCHING the flow of events process that gives coherence and order to the over the past decade or so, it is daily headlines. In this respect, liberalism stands for the emancipation of the individual. It is not only the rebirth of History, it is the end of The Second Dark Age, and the birth of Enlightenment II. Many people agreed. For that reason, Fukuyama's most vehement critics over the years were not … The End of History?-Francis Fukuyama. The twentieth century saw hard to avoid the feeling that the developed world descend into a paroxysm In his 1989 article, The End Of History?, Francis Fukuyama boldly set forth a vision of liberalism in the modern world.In 1992, he deepened his arguments in a book of the same name. In a world longing for liberty, advanced western liberalism seems to have reached a dead-end. Communism’s collapse, he argued, would clear the last obstacle separating the entire world from its destiny of liberal democracy and market economies. In a world longing for liberty, advanced western liberalism seems to have reached a dead-end. At the end of the Cold War, political scientist Francis Fukuyama wrote a celebrated essay called “The End of History?” Communism’s collapse, he argued, would clear the last obstacle separating the entire world from its destiny of liberal democracy and market economies. The "end of history" was always more about ideas than events. More specifically, we are seeing the implosion, public exposure, and complete rejection of the Globalist 'expert' class, which claimed authority by dint of nothing … The end of the 20th century began with confident declarations of the triumph of liberalism and the end of history; the beginning of the 21st century now ends amid fears that liberalism may soon become history.Headlines are replete with pronouncements of the end of liberalism, the retreat of the liberal world order, and threats to liberal democracy. To this end, I want to offer three areas for consideration where one can see liberalism’s two opposing parts advancing a consistent and uniform end by effectually engaging in a pincer movement from two different directions, and in the process destabilizing the very …